How to preserve data integrity at each new step of the value chain without compromising the web content production process in part or in whole? Did you ever wonder why our systems are still failing us, despite the many dedicated users who actively participate in the internet’s countless support forums (1)? This GDPR-focused audit closure report frames the answer to such questions, from the perspective of the meta-convergence of workflows and feeds (2). Let us start with the usual flowchart matrix.

The reintegration of all dimensions of the intellectual property paradigm into a proof of concept to be deemed compliant in terms of conceptual integrity implies the introduction, against the background of the implementation of my master franchising solution for web authors, of four conceptual identifiers conceived so as to provide for the virtuous aggregation of all things compliant into a globally balanced reporting dashboard. This strategy is laid out in the following presentation, from the perspective of the conceptual convergence of equipments.

The global objective (1) towards which the Intranet+ user experience (2) needs to be redeployed in order to meet the GDPR requirements must be reconsidered, against the systemic background of all forces at play, from the perspective of the franchised independent professional aiming for the permanent consolidation of his·her funding basis (or intangible business assets). The following presentation shows a matrix-based dashboard overview of all parameters which must be reintegrated by the formula, in order to set the conceptual convergence dynamics into motion in direction of the expected economic equilibrium of the franchise-sustained meta-reporting system (3):

It is the conceptual integrity principle invoked in the foreword to the present v2.2/2018 which, by monitoring the integration of validated returns on experience into the master-franchising system’s knowledge spectroscopy for decision-making, turns each franchised author into his·her own "Data Protection Officer" (1), until the growth of the latter’s activity justifies the partial delegation of the underlying perimeter of responsibility to another duly franchised partner. Indeed, considering that all data generated by the author goes into the latter’s value creation process in order to be transformed into a knowledge intensive web product and/or service with high commercial value, it is not conceivable to transfer the responsibility of the control of the author’s intangible business assets over to a third-party (2) without infringing the legitimate content owner’s double moral and financial right to sustain a living from his·her creations.

Unlike the GDPR, which repeals and replaces the outdated directives of 1995 to harmonize national EU laws, my Codex+Ultra®, whose beginnings date back to my personal context of the years 2000 to 2003 (1), was developed upon the following findings: